<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stationery or Stationary?  That is the question.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stationersguild.org/news/member-news/stationery-or-stationary-that-is-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stationersguild.org/news/member-news/stationery-or-stationary-that-is-the-question/</link>
	<description>Trends in stationery, wedding invitations, social stationery, baby announcements and holiday cards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.stationersguild.org/news/member-news/stationery-or-stationary-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stationersguild.org/news/?p=53#comment-5</guid>
		<description>All search engines basically work the same.  Words do not have to be spelled properly.  If you want to capture that segment of the search audience that can&#039;t spell properly or simply makes a typing mistake, then you should include variations of key words.  Also, you may want to consider singular and plural variations such as &quot;invitation&quot; and &quot;invitations&quot;.  The importance of this sad state of affairs can&#039;t be dismissed lightly.  In fact, even Crane felt obliged to list &quot;stationary&quot; as an alternative spelling in their meta tags on their home page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All search engines basically work the same.  Words do not have to be spelled properly.  If you want to capture that segment of the search audience that can&#8217;t spell properly or simply makes a typing mistake, then you should include variations of key words.  Also, you may want to consider singular and plural variations such as &#8220;invitation&#8221; and &#8220;invitations&#8221;.  The importance of this sad state of affairs can&#8217;t be dismissed lightly.  In fact, even Crane felt obliged to list &#8220;stationary&#8221; as an alternative spelling in their meta tags on their home page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Dunne</title>
		<link>http://www.stationersguild.org/news/member-news/stationery-or-stationary-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Dunne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stationersguild.org/news/?p=53#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I too found it surprising that Google does not spell stationery correctly, and I tried to correct it only to find that I was sent back constantly to the mispelled stationary. I finally gave up and went with the flow. 

I hope the other search engines are more tuned in to the correct spelling of words. 

I wonder if the mispelling means that we should also mispell the word on our web site if we want to receive hits? What do other think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too found it surprising that Google does not spell stationery correctly, and I tried to correct it only to find that I was sent back constantly to the mispelled stationary. I finally gave up and went with the flow. </p>
<p>I hope the other search engines are more tuned in to the correct spelling of words. </p>
<p>I wonder if the mispelling means that we should also mispell the word on our web site if we want to receive hits? What do other think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

