National Stationery Show (“NSS”) organizers deserve a hardy pat on the back for arranging the fascinating seminar: Navigating the Journey from the 2D to 3D World. The Saturday (May 15th) seminar provided considerable analysis and discussion of the rapidly changing patterns in social communication and its impact on the stationery industry. It is the first time that I can recall that the “Elephant in the Room” (i.e. online communications) has ever been discussed in a public forum at the NSS. It was a most timely and useful wake-up call for the stationery industry.
The seminar was organized into three distinct segments. The first was by Keynote speaker Paco Underhill of Envirosell who gave a charming and insightful presentation on emerging trends in consumer behavior and how savvy retailers should position their businesses to prosper. Mr. Underhill provided many useful suggestions on how store-owners might want to creatively engage their clients through better communication and improved store design. I intend to post a more detailed summary of Mr. Underhill’s comments at a later time.
The more controversial and unsettling discussions took place later. The first panel was hosted by Adam Glassman, Creative Director of O. The Oprah Magazine to discuss “Today – The Issues, Solutions and the Next 5 Years.” Dan Rubinstein, Editor-in-Chief of Surface Magazine, hosted the second panel focusing on “Connecting with tomorrow’s customer and the one 10 years from now.” While the first panel sought to address some of the unsettling issues facing bricks-and-mortar stationers as their suppliers turn to the Internet to deliver stationery products to the end-user, the second panel sought to project current behavior patterns of children 7 to 12 years old and teenagers into future purchasing patterns. At one time, I felt that I just might have to turn my stationery store into an App Store for the iPhone (App is short for Application which is down-loadable software).
Judging from the number of faces in people’s hands at the end of the presentation, you would have thought that Armageddon had arrived. Both discussion moderators deserve praise since they were serving up hard-ball questions to the panelists. I suspect that most everyone who attended the discussion had a slightly different interpretation or spin on the information they were receiving. Some vendors mentioned to me that it was “quite frightening” while others argued that it was “much ado about nothing.” I suspect this was false bravado for, most certainly, there is cause for concern.
One of the panelists argued persuasively that it was great to to use the new technology to schedule birthdays, anniversaries and other milestone events online and have “personalized” greeting cards sent out either digitally or by snail mail. I suspect that many people feel that this is perfectly rational behavior. When people regard communication as little more than an online scheduling exercise, the battle is largely lost. For this panelist, the interpersonal relationships with people he should care most for has now simply been reduced to a programming event. Frankly, this is a world where personal correspondence has little perceived value other than the satisfaction one gets from “mission completed.”
Violet Brandwein, Senior Buyer Kate’s Paperie, commented that “as online and traditional distribution channels become blurred, bricks-and-mortar dealers need to forge a new relationship with their vendors to coexist and prosper.” There is no question that distribution channels have turned into what Paco Underhill refers to as a “bar fight” where bricks-and-mortar dealers, online resellers and suppliers of fine papers are elbowing each other to reach the consumer with the “best package.” Continued friction among distribution channels within the industry will necessarily lead to consequences that are not good for the industry as a whole.
As I have stated on many occasions, unless leaders in the industry step up and take action which may now seem counter-intuitive, the battle is lost. For instance (as one example), I was pleased to learn that Jane Boatman Geller pulled her designs from Shutterfly (not SnapFish as previously reported) since she felt it was not fair to her dealers and distorted the way she wished her line to be represented. This is a courageous decision with the economy being what it is. Companies that continue to overexpose their lines through multiple distribution channels will diminish the value of their brands.
Dealers are remiss in expecting the digital revolution to turn on itself. Here again, all bricks-and-mortar stores who hope to stay in business, must now take decisive action to engage the digital consumer in their own medium. Most consumers want to shop locally: let’s make sure that they can find your store.
Once again, congratulations to the organizers of the National Stationery Show for putting together this great series of informative discussion groups.
Richard W. May
Founding Member Stationers Guild